Moving on. There is such a novelty...

Moving on. There is such a novelty as paid tournaments. It seems like a great idea. Paid participation means bigger prizes for winners and less number of tournament participants. The idea is definitely good, if not for one big but… Logically, if the tournament is a paid tournament, a trader should be able to participate in it for the whole time after paying for it. That is, paid participation and trade until the tournament is over. If you got to the winners during this time – great, if you didn’t get there – well, you didn’t manage to do it. Such an approach would be correct and fair in all respects. Binomo has followed the casino principle in this matter and prioritized not the tournament itself, but to get more money from the participants. In addition to payment for participation in the tournament itself, it is also necessary to pay for each balance update. That is, the principle is as follows – whether you win something in the tournament or not is unimportant, the main thing is to give more money. The fact that you want to collect more money from the tournament is understandable. But why do it this way? Make it more expensive to participate in the tournament. Those tournaments that are 5$ make them 10$, and those that are 10$ make them 20$. That’s all the arithmetic.