Using this office was a "school of...

Using this office was a “school of life”, which allowed me to understand: no “expert” will waste time and give personal advice, if he can just make money by “advising” to drain your deposit.
* Consciously incentivizing clients to lose money.
(1) The minimum trade is 10,000 (0.1 lot), not 1,000 (0.01). This is for the minimum deposit. You deposit more than $10,000 of your own money, the minimum trade becomes 10,000 (1 lot). I.e. not to trade, but to play in a casino with high leverage will be not only a trader with a minimum deposit, but also a big one.
(2) The expert strongly discouraged me from using stop losses. In webinars, the lecturer constantly repeats the idea that “I am not in favor of stops”. There is no miracle: as in any other system such trading leads to rare but critical losses.
* Tight binding by bonuses.
I did not take any “bonuses”, as I found out immediately that it would mean the impossibility to withdraw not only the bonus money, but also my own money.
However, I tried to trade using signals from the Expert Advisor. I agreed that I would be able to ask the expert for advice at the moment of deals closing. When the loss on one of the trades amounted to more than half of the deposit, I tried to get through. The expert did not reply immediately and advised me to add more money.
* “Kitchen broker”.
The account was drained by two unsuccessful deals. But the expert immediately stated that it was insured. If one does not withdraw clients’ funds to the stock exchange and, therefore, does not lose them, then one can be insured for a long time. And the profit made would be paid at the broker’s expense? Or would it be impossible at all?
* Technical instability.
During a month of trading I have twice faced with server unavailability through the browser: once for an hour, the other – for less than an hour.